Abstract
This paper examines the political evolution of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) through the lens of entrenched insensitivity by the political class towards the region’s population. It argues that three persistent tendencies of ambivalence, brinkmanship, and callousness have shaped political conduct from the accession period to contemporary electoral politics. Leaders across ideological lines have often relied on identity mobilisation, religious symbolism, and constitutional maximalism rather than governance and development. Even after the abrogation of Article 370 and the restoration of electoral politics in 2024, symbolic contestation continues to dominate discourse. Such strategies perpetuate instability, marginalise regional diversity, and divert attention from employment, education, and institutional reform necessary for durable peace and democratic consolidation.
Keywords: Conflict economy, Political Relevance, Accession, Abrogation
