Friday, June 5, 2026
Advertise with us
Support us
Write for us
No Result
View All Result
claws
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Director General
    • Additional Director General
    • Jottings by Director General Emiritus
    • CLAWS Membership
    • Faculty
  • Publication
    • Web Articles
    • Issue Briefs
    • Manekshaw Papers
    • Newsletter
    • Essay
    • CLAWS Journal
    • Scholar Warrior
    • Books
    • Intern Articles
    • External Publications
  • Research Areas
    • Global & Regional Security
      • China
      • Pakistan
      • Afghanistan
      • South Asia
      • Indo Pacific
      • US, EU & Russia
      • MENA
      • CAR
    • National Security
      • National Security Strategy
      • Nuclear Deterrence
      • Non Traditional Threats
      • Intelligence
      • Terrorism & Internal Security
      • Grey Z & IW
      • Security Laws
    • Military Studies
      • Military Doctrine
      • Military Strategy
      • Peace Keeping Ops
      • Military History
      • Military Logistics
      • Out of Area Contingency Ops
      • Leadership
    • Military Technology & Defence Acquisition
      • Military Technology
      • Defence Acqn
      • Budgets & Finance
      • Defence Infrastructure
      • Human Resources
    • Multi Domain Studies
      • Jointmanship & Integration
      • Space
      • Cyber
      • Spl Operations
      • Energy & Environment
      • Defence Eco System
      • Defence Diplomacy
      • HADR
  • Web Archive
  • Events
    • Seminars
    • Webinars/RTD
  • PROMEX
  • University Cell
    • About The Initiative
    • Admission: Eligibility and Procedure
    • Guides | Supervisors in the PhD Programme:
    • Important Information
    • Administration
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Director General
    • Additional Director General
    • Jottings by Director General Emiritus
    • CLAWS Membership
    • Faculty
  • Publication
    • Web Articles
    • Issue Briefs
    • Manekshaw Papers
    • Newsletter
    • Essay
    • CLAWS Journal
    • Scholar Warrior
    • Books
    • Intern Articles
    • External Publications
  • Research Areas
    • Global & Regional Security
      • China
      • Pakistan
      • Afghanistan
      • South Asia
      • Indo Pacific
      • US, EU & Russia
      • MENA
      • CAR
    • National Security
      • National Security Strategy
      • Nuclear Deterrence
      • Non Traditional Threats
      • Intelligence
      • Terrorism & Internal Security
      • Grey Z & IW
      • Security Laws
    • Military Studies
      • Military Doctrine
      • Military Strategy
      • Peace Keeping Ops
      • Military History
      • Military Logistics
      • Out of Area Contingency Ops
      • Leadership
    • Military Technology & Defence Acquisition
      • Military Technology
      • Defence Acqn
      • Budgets & Finance
      • Defence Infrastructure
      • Human Resources
    • Multi Domain Studies
      • Jointmanship & Integration
      • Space
      • Cyber
      • Spl Operations
      • Energy & Environment
      • Defence Eco System
      • Defence Diplomacy
      • HADR
  • Web Archive
  • Events
    • Seminars
    • Webinars/RTD
  • PROMEX
  • University Cell
    • About The Initiative
    • Admission: Eligibility and Procedure
    • Guides | Supervisors in the PhD Programme:
    • Important Information
    • Administration
  • Careers
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
CLAWS
No Result
View All Result
Home Articles

Russia’s Pragmatic Turn Towards Afghanistan: Implications for India’s Strategic and Connectivity Interests.

Shreeya Shubhi MohantybyShreeya Shubhi Mohanty
June 5, 2026
in Articles
A A
0
Post Views: 9

Russia and the Taliban led Afghanistan signed a defence cooperation agreement on 27th of May, covering military cooperation and technical-security coordination. This marks the first defence cooperation agreement between the two parties and marks the deepest level of engagement between Moscow and Kabul since the Taliban’s return to power in 2021. Hence, this move can best be understood as part of a broader transformation in Moscow’s Afghanistan Policy.

Motivation behind Russia’s Pragmatic Turn

Afghanistan, as history has noted, remains a critical component of the regional security, influence and interest architecture for Russia. Therefore, since the Taliban’s takeover, Russia has seen a gradual shift in its approach towards Afghanistan from a position of cautious engagement to one of a pragmatic partnership. While Moscow has not abandoned its larger concerns regarding Afghanistan’s administration and security situation. It has still favoured engagement rather than isolation, as a means to safeguard its national and regional interests. Therefore, this is not about ideological alignment but more about a strategic necessity. One of the most important motivations for this move was Moscow’s growing concern over the activities of terrorist groups such as the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP) along with the broader risk of instability in its Southern Borders.

Russia therefore chose to capitalise on the realisation of the political reality that many actors have yet to accept that the Taliban is likely to remain a dominant governing authority in Afghanistan for the foreseeable future. Hence, in the absence of an alternative political order in Kabul, Moscow is seen prioritising dialogue and practical cooperation with Afghanistan over policy and diplomatic isolation, and the recent defence cooperation agreement is the manifestation of this broader trend. One cannot also ignore that the evolving Moscow-Taliban relationship carries an undertone of regional balancing; Russia’s intention to maintain influence and hold strategic significance in the region post-US withdrawal is quite evident. Especially in

the context of the China factor. Over the years, China has steadily expanded its engagement with Afghanistan through diplomatic outreach and economic initiatives. Therefore, this move by Russia makes Moscow an additional centre of influence, reinforcing the multipolar character of regional politics. This agreement becomes more than just about managing security threats emanating from Afghanistan but also actively shaping developments within the country through economic, political and now military and institutionalised engagement.

Implications for India

As Russia, one of New Delhi’s closest strategic partners, deepens its engagement with the Taliban, India must carefully assess the implications of this shift for its own strategic, diplomatic and economic interests. For India, the significance of Russia’s evolving engagement with Afghanistan lies less in the obvious military dimensions of the agreement and more in the changing regional environment, especially in South and Central Asia. Several aspects of Moscow’s approach, like counter terrorism, cooperation and support for regional stability, overlap with India’s priorities. Hence, it becomes important for Indian policymakers to identify areas where interests converge and be mindful of evolving regional dynamics.

India is known to maintain a distinct approach towards Afghanistan. India’s investment towards Kabul has been about developmental assistance, institution building, infrastructure projects and people-to-people ties by undertaking projects like the Afghan Parliament building, the Salma dam and various capacity-building initiatives, which have helped New Delhi cultivate considerable goodwill among the Afghan population. Russia’s growing engagement with Afghanistan opens up diplomatic space for India to recalibrate its approach and pursue its interests without compromising on broader strategic objectives of safeguarding its regional and national interests.

For over two decades, New Delhi has sought to overcome geographical constraints and expand its access to Afghanistan and the wider Eurasian region through initiatives such as the Chabahar Port Project and associated transit arrangements. While the internal instability and external suspicion impede these efforts. A stabilised Afghanistan could potentially enhance and forward India’s regional connectivity prospects. This can make India become an active participant in shaping South Asian and Central Asian dynamics rather than an observer of regional change.

Despite potential opportunities, there are various challenges that cloud India’s interests. India’s engagement with Afghanistan remains constrained by security concerns, uncertainty surrounding the country’s political trajectory, internal administration gaps and absence of international consensus on Taliban Government. These factors have the potential to limit New Delhi’s ability to translate emerging regional openings into connectivity gains and tangible, sustainable strategic interests. Moreover, for New Delhi, the challenge is not the Russia-Afghanistan Defence MoU in itself but the broader regional and international momentum towards increasing strategic interests with Kabul. As major powers come to position themselves as stakeholders in Afghanistan’s future, New Delhi needs to ensure that its connectivity ambitions, developmental investments and national interests neither become an alternative for Kabul nor become sidelined. This risk is less of direct competition but gradual marginalisation, in a country where India has enjoyed significant goodwill and influence. Hence, for India, it is within this context that the recent defence MoU assumes greater significance, rather than being viewed as a solitary military agreement. It calls on New Delhi to pay close attention to the regional developments in Afghanistan, in order to continue being an active participant in shaping the country’s future through calibrated diplomacy, humanitarian intervention, sustained developmental investment and preservation of long-term strategic interests. Especially when one of its closest strategic partners is expanding engagement, India needs to find leverage in matters of how this evolving relationship could influence its own interests.

Tags: AfghanistanUS, EU & Russia
Previous Post

Political Landscape of Myanmar Since the Presidential Elections: Promise of Political Change vs Reality of Piecemeal Reforms

Shreeya Shubhi Mohanty

Shreeya Shubhi Mohanty

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support Us Donate Now

Web Updates

Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competiton 2026

🚀 Applications Open | CLAWS Research Internship Programme – Summer Session | 10th April to 11th May 2026

CLAWS MAHE PHD PGME | CALL FOR ADMISSIONS: PHD BATCH- 9

In the Budget 2026-27 | Machine Sourced

Promotion Exam Correspondence Pre Course (PROMEX)

Guidelines to Publish with CLAWS

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Russia-Ukraine War: Lessons from an Electronic Warfare (EW) Perspective

Russia-Ukraine War: Lessons from an Electronic Warfare (EW) Perspective

May 31, 2025
Results | Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competition – 2024

Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competiton 2025

May 23, 2025
Op Sindoor 2.0: Why & How India Must Prepare for the Next Round?

Op Sindoor 2.0: Why & How India Must Prepare for the Next Round?

May 21, 2025
From Sword Clashes to Drone Strikes: A History of Changing Battlefields

From Sword Clashes to Drone Strikes: A History of Changing Battlefields

July 31, 2025
From Sword Clashes to Drone Strikes: A History of Changing Battlefields

From Sword Clashes to Drone Strikes: A History of Changing Battlefields

15
The Arakan Army and Its Impact on India: Rising Tensions Along the Eastern Frontier 

The Arakan Army and Its Impact on India: Rising Tensions Along the Eastern Frontier 

5

Thwarting  Pakistan’s Nefarious Designs in Bangladesh

5
India’s Pursuit of Self-Sufficiency in Rare Earth and Critical Minerals: South Caucasus as an Option

India’s Pursuit of Self-Sufficiency in Rare Earth and Critical Minerals: South Caucasus as an Option

3
Russia’s Pragmatic Turn Towards Afghanistan: Implications for India’s Strategic and Connectivity Interests.

Russia’s Pragmatic Turn Towards Afghanistan: Implications for India’s Strategic and Connectivity Interests.

June 5, 2026
Political Landscape of Myanmar Since the Presidential Elections: Promise of Political Change vs Reality of Piecemeal Reforms

Political Landscape of Myanmar Since the Presidential Elections: Promise of Political Change vs Reality of Piecemeal Reforms

June 3, 2026
CLAWS Cyber Newsletter I 01 – 15 April 2025

CLAWS Cyber Newsletter | May 16 – 31 2026

June 1, 2026
China Fortnightly Newsletter I January 01 – 15 2026

China Fortnightly | Volume I | Issue No. 001

May 24, 2026

Popular Stories

  • Russia-Ukraine War: Lessons from an Electronic Warfare (EW) Perspective

    Russia-Ukraine War: Lessons from an Electronic Warfare (EW) Perspective

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competiton 2025

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Op Sindoor 2.0: Why & How India Must Prepare for the Next Round?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • From Sword Clashes to Drone Strikes: A History of Changing Battlefields

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • 🚀 Applications Open | CLAWS Research Internship Programme – Summer Session | 10th April to 11th May 2026

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

About us

CLAWS

The Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS), New Delhi, India is an independent think tank on strategic studies and land warfare. The mandate of CLAWS covers national security issues, conventional military operations and sub-conventional warfare.

Browse by Category

  • Articles
  • Autumn 2019
  • Autumn 2020
  • Books
  • Chanakya Defence Dialogue
  • CLAWS Focus
  • CLAWS Journal
  • Essay
  • Events
  • External Publications
  • FMMEC
  • Intern Articles
  • Issue Briefs
  • Jottings by Director General Emiritus
  • Manekshaw Papers
  • Newsletter
  • Round Tables
  • Scholar Warrior
  • Seminars
  • Uncategorized
  • Web Updates
  • Winter 2019
  • YouTube Podcast

Recent News

Russia’s Pragmatic Turn Towards Afghanistan: Implications for India’s Strategic and Connectivity Interests.

Russia’s Pragmatic Turn Towards Afghanistan: Implications for India’s Strategic and Connectivity Interests.

June 5, 2026
Political Landscape of Myanmar Since the Presidential Elections: Promise of Political Change vs Reality of Piecemeal Reforms

Political Landscape of Myanmar Since the Presidential Elections: Promise of Political Change vs Reality of Piecemeal Reforms

June 3, 2026
  • Site Map
  • Tenders
  • Advertise With Us
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Other Think Tanks

© 2008-2026 Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS).

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Director General
    • Additional Director General
    • Jottings by Director General Emiritus
    • CLAWS Membership
    • Faculty
  • Publication
    • Web Articles
    • Issue Briefs
    • Manekshaw Papers
    • Newsletter
    • Essay
    • CLAWS Journal
    • Scholar Warrior
    • Books
    • Intern Articles
    • External Publications
  • Research Areas
    • Global & Regional Security
      • China
      • Pakistan
      • Afghanistan
      • South Asia
      • Indo Pacific
      • US, EU & Russia
      • MENA
      • CAR
    • National Security
      • National Security Strategy
      • Nuclear Deterrence
      • Non Traditional Threats
      • Intelligence
      • Terrorism & Internal Security
      • Grey Z & IW
      • Security Laws
    • Military Studies
      • Military Doctrine
      • Military Strategy
      • Peace Keeping Ops
      • Military History
      • Military Logistics
      • Out of Area Contingency Ops
      • Leadership
    • Military Technology & Defence Acquisition
      • Military Technology
      • Defence Acqn
      • Budgets & Finance
      • Defence Infrastructure
      • Human Resources
    • Multi Domain Studies
      • Jointmanship & Integration
      • Space
      • Cyber
      • Spl Operations
      • Energy & Environment
      • Defence Eco System
      • Defence Diplomacy
      • HADR
  • Web Archive
  • Events
    • Seminars
    • Webinars/RTD
  • PROMEX
  • University Cell
    • About The Initiative
    • Admission: Eligibility and Procedure
    • Guides | Supervisors in the PhD Programme:
    • Important Information
    • Administration
  • Careers
  • Contact

© 2008-2026 Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS).