Tuesday, July 1, 2025
Advertise with us
Support us
Write for us
No Result
View All Result
claws
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Director General
    • Additional Director General
    • Jottings by Director General Emiritus
    • CLAWS Membership
    • Faculty
  • Publication
    • Web Articles
    • Issue Briefs
    • Manekshaw Papers
    • Newsletter
    • CLAWS Journal
    • Scholar Warrior
    • Books
    • Essay
    • Intern Articles
    • External Publications
  • Research Areas
    • Global & Regional Security
      • China
      • Pakistan
      • Afghanistan
      • South Asia
      • Indo Pacific
      • US, EU & Russia
      • MENA
      • CAR
    • National Security
      • National Security Strategy
      • Nuclear Deterrence
      • Non Traditional Threats
      • Intelligence
      • Terrorism & Internal Security
      • Grey Z & IW
      • Security Laws
    • Military Studies
      • Military Doctrine
      • Military Strategy
      • Peace Keeping Ops
      • Military History
      • Military Logistics
      • Out of Area Contingency Ops
      • Leadership
    • Military Technology & Defence Acquisition
      • Military Technology
      • Defence Acqn
      • Budgets & Finance
      • Defence Infrastructure
      • Human Resources
    • Multi Domain Studies
      • Jointmanship & Integration
      • Space
      • Cyber
      • Spl Operations
      • Energy & Environment
      • Defence Eco System
      • Defence Diplomacy
      • HADR
  • Web Archive
  • Events
    • Seminars
    • Webinars/RTD
  • PROMEX
  • University Cell
    • About The Initiative
    • Admission: Eligibility and Procedure
    • Important Information
    • Administration
    • Guides | Supervisors
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Director General
    • Additional Director General
    • Jottings by Director General Emiritus
    • CLAWS Membership
    • Faculty
  • Publication
    • Web Articles
    • Issue Briefs
    • Manekshaw Papers
    • Newsletter
    • CLAWS Journal
    • Scholar Warrior
    • Books
    • Essay
    • Intern Articles
    • External Publications
  • Research Areas
    • Global & Regional Security
      • China
      • Pakistan
      • Afghanistan
      • South Asia
      • Indo Pacific
      • US, EU & Russia
      • MENA
      • CAR
    • National Security
      • National Security Strategy
      • Nuclear Deterrence
      • Non Traditional Threats
      • Intelligence
      • Terrorism & Internal Security
      • Grey Z & IW
      • Security Laws
    • Military Studies
      • Military Doctrine
      • Military Strategy
      • Peace Keeping Ops
      • Military History
      • Military Logistics
      • Out of Area Contingency Ops
      • Leadership
    • Military Technology & Defence Acquisition
      • Military Technology
      • Defence Acqn
      • Budgets & Finance
      • Defence Infrastructure
      • Human Resources
    • Multi Domain Studies
      • Jointmanship & Integration
      • Space
      • Cyber
      • Spl Operations
      • Energy & Environment
      • Defence Eco System
      • Defence Diplomacy
      • HADR
  • Web Archive
  • Events
    • Seminars
    • Webinars/RTD
  • PROMEX
  • University Cell
    • About The Initiative
    • Admission: Eligibility and Procedure
    • Important Information
    • Administration
    • Guides | Supervisors
  • Careers
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
CLAWS
No Result
View All Result
Home Articles

Pakistan’s Hollow Posturing: Desperate Contradictions Expose A Nation In Panic

Ashu MaanbyAshu Maan
May 2, 2025
in Articles
A A
0
Post Views: 205

Originally publishedt at: https://www.eurasiareview.com/02052025-pakistans-hollow-posturing-desperate-contradictions-expose-a-nation-in-panic-oped/

As tensions mount between India and Pakistan following the Pahalgam terror attack, Pakistan’s response has been a jarring symphony of contradictions, exposing deep fissures within its establishment and revealing a nation desperate to avoid confrontation while simultaneously beating the drums of war.

Pakistan’s leadership has veered from nuclear threats to peace overtures, from denying terrorism links to admitting them, and from projecting military strength to revealing embarrassing operational weaknesses – all within a matter of days.

Confessions and Contradictions: Pakistan’s Terror Admission

In what can only be described as a stunning diplomatic self-goal, Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif openly admitted on international television that his country has been supporting, training, and funding terrorist organizations for three decades. When directly questioned by a Sky News journalist about Pakistan’s history of backing terror outfits, Asif responded with a candid confession: “We have been doing this dirty work for the United States for about 3 decades… and the west, including Britain.”

This extraordinary admission came just days after the horrific Pahalgam attack that claimed 26 innocent lives, mostly tourists visiting Kashmir. Asif awkwardly attempted to deflect blame onto Western nations, describing Pakistan’s support for terrorism as a “mistake” for which the country has “suffered.” He further claimed that Pakistan’s international reputation would have remained “unimpeachable” had it not aligned with Western powers during the Soviet-Afghan war and following the 9/11 attacks.

The confession has severely undermined Pakistan’s longstanding denial of state sponsorship of terrorism and validates what India has maintained for decades. At the United Nations, India’s Deputy Permanent Representative, Ambassador Yojna Patel, seized upon Asif’s comments, stating that “this open confession surprises no one and exposes Pakistan as a rogue state fuelling global terrorism and destabilising the region.”

The Fabricated Front Line: Gen Asim Munir’s “Visit” Deception

Even as Pakistan desperately tries to project military readiness, its propaganda machinery has resorted to recycling old footage. A video widely circulated on social media purportedly showing Pakistan’s Army Chief General Asim Munir visiting the Line of Control (LoC) to inspect “operational readiness” amid rising tensions has been conclusively proven false. Fact-checking revealed that the footage actually dates back to December 2022, shortly after Munir assumed command of Pakistan’s armed forces. Multiple reportings, including in Pakistani media outlet Dawn, confirm that the video shows Munir’s visit to frontline troops in the Rakhchikri Sector over two years ago. The deliberate misrepresentation of old footage as current appears to be a calculated attempt to reassure Pakistan’s domestic audience while projecting strength to India – a facade that crumbled under basic scrutiny.

Digital Delusions: Pakistan Air Force’s Embarrassing Visual Blunders

In perhaps the most embarrassing display of Pakistan’s desperate attempts to inflate its military capabilities, the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) released a propaganda video on April 29 that inadvertently showcased foreign military hardware as its own. The official video, published by the Directorate General of Public Relations of the PAF, titled “Pakistan Air Force Reaffirms Unwavering Commitment to National Sovereignty & Defence Excellence,” became an international laughingstock within hours.

Indian analysts and social media users quickly identified glaring errors in the supposed display of Pakistan’s military might. Incredibly, the video included footage of Russia’s S-400 air defense system, a sophisticated platform operated by India but not Pakistan – alongside imagery of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, an American commercial launch vehicle with absolutely no connection to Pakistan’s military.

“PAF showcasing Indian S-400s in their defence video. We accept your admiration,” mocked one Indian social media user, while another commented, “PAF now has Falcon 9? Elon Musk must be surprised!” The incident has not only subjected Pakistan to ridicule but has also exposed the profound insecurity and technological limitations of its armed forces.

Nuclear Posturing: The Last Refuge of the Desperate

Facing India’s resolute stance following the Pahalgam attack, Pakistan has predictably resorted to nuclear sabre-rattling. Defence Minister Khawaja Asif warned of using nuclear weapons “if there is a direct threat to our existence,” while Railway Minister Hanif Abbasi menacingly claimed that Pakistan’s arsenal of “Ghori, Shaheen and Ghaznavi missiles along with 130 nuclear warheads” has been kept “only for India.”

This reckless invocation of nuclear threats stands in stark contrast to India’s responsible nuclear doctrine, which includes a firm commitment to “no-first-use.” Pakistan’s nuclear posturing appears increasingly desperate, aimed less at deterrence and more at attracting international attention and intervention.

Military experts analysing the situation have dismissed Pakistan’s nuclear threats as hollow. On an India Today broadcast, Lieutenant General Satish Da, former chief of integrated defense staff, observed: “Pakistan has been playing the nuclear card for too long… Pakistan knows that it is no match for India in conventional terms both qualitatively and quantitatively and in fact that is why it has waged this death by thousand cuts policy proxy war.”5

The Panic Button: Fears of Indian Retaliation

The contradictions in Pakistan’s messaging reached a fever pitch when, in the early hours of Wednesday, Pakistan’s Information Minister Ata Tar published a video claiming “credible intelligence” that India intended to carry out military action against Pakistan within “24 to 36 hours. “This dramatic midnight announcement betrayed Pakistan’s mounting anxiety about potential Indian retaliation for the Pahalgam attack.

Even as Pakistan’s military establishment projects confidence, the civilian leadership appears to be preparing the ground for international intervention. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has called for a “neutral, transparent and credible investigation” into the Pahalgam attack, a proposal that was quickly endorsed by China in what appears to be a coordinated diplomatic manoeuvre to prevent Indian military action.

Sharif’s plea for international involvement stands in stark contrast to his simultaneous warning that “nobody should remain under any false pretence. Our armed forces are fully capable and prepared to defend the country against any misadventure.” The cognitive dissonance in these statements reveals a nation desperately trying to avoid confrontation while saving face domestically.

A House Divided: Pakistan’s Incoherent Messaging

The disparate voices emerging from Pakistan’s establishment reveal a nation without a cohesive strategy. While the Defence Minister admits to decades of terrorism support, the Prime Minister insists that “Pakistan has always condemned terrorism in all its forms and manifestations.” While military commanders threaten retaliation, civilian leaders seek international mediation.

This cacophony of conflicting messages reveals a profound disconnect between Pakistan’s civilian government, military establishment, and intelligence apparatus – each pursuing different priorities and speaking to different audiences.

Last Word

As India maintains a measured yet firm stance following the Pahalgam attack, Pakistan’s frantic posturing and contradictory messaging expose a nation painfully aware of its military disadvantages. The recycling of old footage, embarrassing propaganda blunders, desperate nuclear threats, and contradictory statements paint a picture of a state in disarray.

Pakistan’s conventional military inferiority is stark. As noted by Commodore Anil J Singh, “We’ve got 16 subs, they’ve got three, so that’s a sort of asymmetry between our two naval forces.” This disparity extends across all military domains, leaving Pakistan with few options beyond nuclear threats and appeals for international intervention.

As tensions continue to simmer, Pakistan’s leadership must reckon with the consequences of its decades-long support for terrorism and the unsustainability of its current posture. No amount of chest-thumping, manufactured imagery, or nuclear threats can disguise the fundamental weakness of a nation caught in its own contradictions.

Previous Post

Tension Waves: Trincomalee Drill In Question

Next Post

Strategic Stances on Pahalgam

Ashu Maan

Ashu Maan

Ashu Maan is an Associate Fellow at the Centre for Land Warfare Studies. He was awarded the VCOAS Commendation card on Army Day 2025. He is currently pursuing his PhD from Amity University, Noida in Defence and Strategic Studies. He has previously worked with Institute of Chinese Studies. He has also contributed a chapter on “Denuclearization of North Korea” in the book titled Drifts and Dynamics: Russia’s Ukraine War and Northeast Asia. His research includes India-China territorial dispute, the Great Power Rivalry between the United States and China, and China’s Foreign Policy.

Next Post
Strategic Stances on Pahalgam

Strategic Stances on Pahalgam

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support Us Donate Now

Web Updates

List of Shortlisted Officers / Candidates: PhD Batch – 7

Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competiton 2025

Guidelines to Publish with CLAWS

Summer Internship Capsule 2025

Application Form – Study Mtrl for DSSC 2025

[NEW] Application Form for membership for PROMEX (PART B or D)

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

Summer Internship Capsule 2025

April 8, 2025
Results | Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competition – 2024

Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competiton 2025

May 23, 2025
Pahalgam Response: Why India Must Fight Smart?

Pahalgam Response: Why India Must Fight Smart?

May 2, 2025
Op Sindoor 2.0: Why & How India Must Prepare for the Next Round?

Op Sindoor 2.0: Why & How India Must Prepare for the Next Round?

May 21, 2025

Front Organisations: The Valley’s Homegrown ‘Resistance’ or Pakistan’s Evolving Terrorism Tactics?

2
DefAI: Cyber & AI Frontiers for Defence | The Third Cyber Workshop from CLAWS & HACKTIFY

DefAI: Cyber & AI Frontiers for Defence | The Third Cyber Workshop from CLAWS & HACKTIFY

2
Great Power Rivalry in the Arctic and India

Great Power Rivalry in the Arctic and India

2

Clausewitz, pagers, and the evolving art of supply chain attacks

1
CLAWS Russia Newsletter | 16 – 31 May 2025

CLAWS Russia Newsletter | 1 – 30 June 2025

July 1, 2025
China Talkies: India Opting Out of SCO Joint Defence Statement

China Talkies: India Opting Out of SCO Joint Defence Statement

June 30, 2025
Diplomacy in Writing, Deterrence in Action: U.S. and Iran Engage in a ‘He Said-She Said’ Battle of Messages and Military Threats

Diplomacy in Writing, Deterrence in Action: U.S. and Iran Engage in a ‘He Said-She Said’ Battle of Messages and Military Threats

June 30, 2025
Game Changers in the Sky: Drones as Force Multiplier in the Russia – Ukraine War

Game Changers in the Sky: Drones as Force Multiplier in the Russia – Ukraine War

June 30, 2025

Popular Stories

  • Summer Internship Capsule 2025

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competiton 2025

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Pahalgam Response: Why India Must Fight Smart?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Op Sindoor 2.0: Why & How India Must Prepare for the Next Round?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Results | Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competition – 2024

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

About us

CLAWS

The Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS), New Delhi, India is an independent think tank on strategic studies and land warfare. The mandate of CLAWS covers national security issues, conventional military operations and sub-conventional warfare.

Follow Us

Browse by Category

  • Articles
  • Autumn 2019
  • Autumn 2020
  • Books
  • CLAWS Focus
  • CLAWS Journal
  • Essay
  • Events
  • External Publications
  • FMMEC
  • Intern Articles
  • Issue Briefs
  • Jottings by Director General Emiritus
  • Manekshaw Papers
  • Newsletter
  • Round Tables
  • Scholar Warrior
  • Seminars
  • Uncategorized
  • Web Updates
  • Winter 2019
  • YouTube Podcast

Recent News

CLAWS Russia Newsletter | 16 – 31 May 2025

CLAWS Russia Newsletter | 1 – 30 June 2025

July 1, 2025
China Talkies: India Opting Out of SCO Joint Defence Statement

China Talkies: India Opting Out of SCO Joint Defence Statement

June 30, 2025
  • Site Map
  • Tenders
  • Advertise With Us
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Other Think Tanks

© 2008-2024 Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS).

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Director General
    • Additional Director General
    • Jottings by Director General Emiritus
    • CLAWS Membership
    • Faculty
  • Publication
    • Web Articles
    • Issue Briefs
    • Manekshaw Papers
    • Newsletter
    • CLAWS Journal
    • Scholar Warrior
    • Books
    • Essay
    • Intern Articles
    • External Publications
  • Research Areas
    • Global & Regional Security
      • China
      • Pakistan
      • Afghanistan
      • South Asia
      • Indo Pacific
      • US, EU & Russia
      • MENA
      • CAR
    • National Security
      • National Security Strategy
      • Nuclear Deterrence
      • Non Traditional Threats
      • Intelligence
      • Terrorism & Internal Security
      • Grey Z & IW
      • Security Laws
    • Military Studies
      • Military Doctrine
      • Military Strategy
      • Peace Keeping Ops
      • Military History
      • Military Logistics
      • Out of Area Contingency Ops
      • Leadership
    • Military Technology & Defence Acquisition
      • Military Technology
      • Defence Acqn
      • Budgets & Finance
      • Defence Infrastructure
      • Human Resources
    • Multi Domain Studies
      • Jointmanship & Integration
      • Space
      • Cyber
      • Spl Operations
      • Energy & Environment
      • Defence Eco System
      • Defence Diplomacy
      • HADR
  • Web Archive
  • Events
    • Seminars
    • Webinars/RTD
  • PROMEX
  • University Cell
    • About The Initiative
    • Admission: Eligibility and Procedure
    • Important Information
    • Administration
    • Guides | Supervisors
  • Careers
  • Contact

© 2008-2024 Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS).