Sunday, June 1, 2025
Advertise with us
Support us
Write for us
No Result
View All Result
claws
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Director General
    • Additional Director General
    • Jottings by Director General Emiritus
    • CLAWS Membership
    • Faculty
  • Publication
    • Web Articles
    • Issue Briefs
    • Manekshaw Papers
    • Newsletter
    • CLAWS Journal
    • Scholar Warrior
    • Books
    • Essay
    • Intern Articles
    • External Publications
  • Research Areas
    • Global & Regional Security
      • China
      • Pakistan
      • Afghanistan
      • South Asia
      • Indo Pacific
      • US, EU & Russia
      • MENA
      • CAR
    • National Security
      • National Security Strategy
      • Nuclear Deterrence
      • Non Traditional Threats
      • Intelligence
      • Terrorism & Internal Security
      • Grey Z & IW
      • Security Laws
    • Military Studies
      • Military Doctrine
      • Military Strategy
      • Peace Keeping Ops
      • Military History
      • Military Logistics
      • Out of Area Contingency Ops
      • Leadership
    • Military Technology & Defence Acquisition
      • Military Technology
      • Defence Acqn
      • Budgets & Finance
      • Defence Infrastructure
      • Human Resources
    • Multi Domain Studies
      • Jointmanship & Integration
      • Space
      • Cyber
      • Spl Operations
      • Energy & Environment
      • Defence Eco System
      • Defence Diplomacy
      • HADR
  • Web Archive
  • Events
    • Seminars
    • Webinars/RTD
  • PROMEX
  • University Cell
    • About The Initiative
    • Admission: Eligibility and Procedure
    • Important Information
    • Administration
    • Guides | Supervisors
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Director General
    • Additional Director General
    • Jottings by Director General Emiritus
    • CLAWS Membership
    • Faculty
  • Publication
    • Web Articles
    • Issue Briefs
    • Manekshaw Papers
    • Newsletter
    • CLAWS Journal
    • Scholar Warrior
    • Books
    • Essay
    • Intern Articles
    • External Publications
  • Research Areas
    • Global & Regional Security
      • China
      • Pakistan
      • Afghanistan
      • South Asia
      • Indo Pacific
      • US, EU & Russia
      • MENA
      • CAR
    • National Security
      • National Security Strategy
      • Nuclear Deterrence
      • Non Traditional Threats
      • Intelligence
      • Terrorism & Internal Security
      • Grey Z & IW
      • Security Laws
    • Military Studies
      • Military Doctrine
      • Military Strategy
      • Peace Keeping Ops
      • Military History
      • Military Logistics
      • Out of Area Contingency Ops
      • Leadership
    • Military Technology & Defence Acquisition
      • Military Technology
      • Defence Acqn
      • Budgets & Finance
      • Defence Infrastructure
      • Human Resources
    • Multi Domain Studies
      • Jointmanship & Integration
      • Space
      • Cyber
      • Spl Operations
      • Energy & Environment
      • Defence Eco System
      • Defence Diplomacy
      • HADR
  • Web Archive
  • Events
    • Seminars
    • Webinars/RTD
  • PROMEX
  • University Cell
    • About The Initiative
    • Admission: Eligibility and Procedure
    • Important Information
    • Administration
    • Guides | Supervisors
  • Careers
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
CLAWS
No Result
View All Result
Home Articles

China’s Strategic Perspective on the Rise of Great Powers: A Techno-Industrial Paradigm

Ashu MaanbyAshu Maan
February 15, 2025
in Articles, CLAWS Focus
A A
0
Post Views: 48

In recent decades, China has emerged not only as an economic power but also as a nation deeply engaged in rethinking the dynamics that shape global power. Rather than relying solely on traditional instruments of military might or conventional diplomacy, contemporary Chinese thought increasingly emphasizes the pivotal role of technology and industrial development in national strength. This perspective, widely reflected in academic and state security discussions, posits that the rise and fall of great powers are fundamentally determined by a country’s ability to harness advanced technologies and to drive productivity across its economy. China’s techno-industrial strategy, supported by the Total National Security Paradigm, aims to secure long-term national power through innovation, while navigating global competition and potential economic challenges.

Historical Lessons: The Blueprint of Power

Chinese historians believes in the ‘historical cycle of rise and fall’, where a dynasty rises to the top in culture, economy, and power and then ultimately falls. The same was also emphasised by Xi Jinping, in his report to China’s 2022 party congress. In the report, Xi declared that the ‘party has found a way to escape the cycle and that is through self-reform’. History provides numerous examples of empires that soared to global prominence by capitalizing on territorial assets, demographic strength, and abundant natural resources. Yet, a closer look at the trajectories of these great powers reveals that their ultimate ascendance was closely tied to their capacity for technological innovation and industrialization. The evolution from economies centered on light industries, such as textiles, to those capable of supporting heavy, capital-intensive sectors like steel production illustrates a clear developmental pathway. Once a nation builds the necessary educational and research infrastructure, it can transition into a hub for innovation and, eventually, global leadership in technology.

Chinese strategic analyses underscore that economic prosperity, fueled by technological advancement, is the engine that drives national power. The competitive edge on the international stage has consistently shifted toward those countries that can integrate cutting-edge technology into their national economies. In this view, industrialization is not merely an economic goal but a strategic imperative, a necessary condition for any nation aspiring to secure its place among the world’s great powers.

The Total National Security Paradigm

At the heart of contemporary Chinese thought is a comprehensive approach to national security. This integrated framework, often referred to as the Total National Security Paradigm, extends beyond traditional notions of defense to encompass every aspect of state activity, from economic policies and technological development to social stability and international influence. Developed over recent years, this paradigm is designed to guide policymakers and government cadres in minimizing risks and neutralizing threats across all domains.

Rather than compartmentalizing national security into discrete sectors, Chinese strategic thought now advocates for a holistic view. The emphasis is on ensuring that every facet of state governance contributes to building and maintaining a robust, technologically advanced economy. This approach reflects a clear recognition that in the modern world, military might, and diplomatic maneuvering are deeply intertwined with economic performance and scientific progress. The focus, therefore, is on long-term, sustainable development as the key to national rejuvenation.

Industrialization and the Power of Productivity

China’s journey from a period of relative poverty in the 1970s to its current status as a global economic leader is a testament to the power of industrialization. The nation’s leadership has consistently prioritized investments in education, research, and technological infrastructure. These efforts have allowed China to climb the industrial ladder, moving from basic manufacturing to sophisticated high-tech industries. The result is a vibrant economy that not only fuels domestic growth but also positions China as a key player in international trade and technological innovation.

By strategically investing in research and development, China has managed to integrate advanced science into every level of its economy. This focus on productivity has provided a foundation for economic growth, reinforcing the idea that national strength in the 21st century is less about territorial conquest and more about the ability to drive continuous technological progress.

Technological Competition on the Global Stage: China’s Strategic Priorities in 2024

In the evolving global landscape, the competition between nations is increasingly defined by technological supremacy rather than traditional military confrontations. For China, this shift has reinforced the strategic importance of technological leadership as both a safeguard against external vulnerabilities and a driver of national prosperity. Amid intensifying geopolitical tensions and escalating economic decoupling efforts led by the United States and its allies, China has doubled down on its efforts to achieve self-reliance in critical technologies.

The current technological race is centered on cutting-edge sectors such as artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing, semiconductors, advanced manufacturing, renewable energy, and biotechnology fields that hold the potential to redefine both economic power structures and military capabilities. The emergence of AI-driven military applications, quantum-enabled cybersecurity, and next-generation chip fabrication has heightened the urgency for China to close technological gaps and mitigate external dependencies.

Learning from the Past, Shaping the Future

Historical case studies of former great powers provide a roadmap for understanding the dynamics of national strength. European empires, Japan’s post-Meiji industrial revival, and the Cold War-era competition between the United States and the Soviet Union all share a common thread: economic transformation driven by technological and industrial progress. In each instance, the failure to adapt to new technological paradigms resulted in stagnation or decline, while nations that successfully integrated industrial innovation into their strategic planning experienced significant rejuvenation.

Chinese analysts have distilled these lessons into a coherent framework that informs current policy. They assert that any country’s future is inextricably linked to its ability to master and implement new technologies. For China, this means ensuring that the economic policies, educational systems, and research initiatives are all aligned with the goal of sustaining long-term industrial growth. In doing so, the nation aims to avoid the pitfalls that have ensnared other countries, whether those be missed opportunities for industrialization or strategic missteps in the face of emerging technologies.

Navigating Future Challenges

While China’s progress in industrialization and technological innovation has been impressive, the nation still faces significant challenges on the road ahead. Achieving complete technological supremacy is an ongoing effort that demands sustained investment and a willingness to adapt to rapidly changing global trends. Moreover, as other nations also ramp up their industrial policies and technological capabilities, China must remain vigilant against complacency.

Future challenges will likely require China to broaden its strategic framework beyond the techno-industrial model. Integrating elements of military modernization, diplomatic agility, and internal social harmony will be essential to maintaining a balanced and resilient national strategy. In this context, the Total National Security Paradigm may need to evolve, incorporating lessons from a broader array of disciplines to address the multifaceted nature of modern power.

Conclusion

China’s strategic perspective on the rise of great powers is firmly rooted in a techno-industrial paradigm that emphasizes the centrality of economic productivity and technological innovation. Drawing on historical lessons and the experience of its own rapid industrialization, China has crafted a national security framework that integrates economic, technological, and strategic objectives. This holistic approach reflects a belief that the ultimate determinant of national strength is not just military might or diplomatic prowess, but the sustained ability to drive scientific and industrial progress.

As the international order continues to evolve, the Chinese model offers a distinctive blueprint for national rejuvenation, one that prioritizes long-term industrial growth and technological leadership over traditional, short-term measures of power. While this approach has already yielded remarkable dividends for China, the path to future supremacy will require continuous adaptation and a willingness to integrate new dimensions of power. In an era where the competition among nations is increasingly defined by the race for innovation, China’s commitment to a techno-industrial strategy may well shape the global balance of power for decades to come.

Tags: China
Previous Post

Russia-Ukraine War: Strategic Conundrumby Bharti Das and Uday Pratap Singh

Next Post

CLAWS Bangladesh Newsletter I 01 – 15 Feb 2025

Ashu Maan

Ashu Maan

Ashu Maan is an Associate Fellow at the Centre for Land Warfare Studies. He was awarded the VCOAS Commendation card on Army Day 2025. He is currently pursuing his PhD from Amity University, Noida in Defence and Strategic Studies. He has previously worked with Institute of Chinese Studies. He has also contributed a chapter on “Denuclearization of North Korea” in the book titled Drifts and Dynamics: Russia’s Ukraine War and Northeast Asia. His research includes India-China territorial dispute, the Great Power Rivalry between the United States and China, and China’s Foreign Policy.

Next Post
CLAWS Bangladesh Newsletter I 01 – 15 April 2025

CLAWS Bangladesh Newsletter I 01 – 15 Feb 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support Us Donate Now

Web Updates

List of Shortlisted Officers / Candidates: PhD Batch – 7

Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competiton 2025

Guidelines to Publish with CLAWS

Summer Internship Capsule 2025

Application Form – Study Mtrl for DSSC 2025

[NEW] Application Form for membership for PROMEX (PART B or D)

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

Summer Internship Capsule 2025

April 8, 2025
Pahalgam Response: Why India Must Fight Smart?

Pahalgam Response: Why India Must Fight Smart?

May 2, 2025
Results | Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competition – 2024

Results | Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competition – 2024

April 2, 2025
Op Sindoor 2.0: Why & How India Must Prepare for the Next Round?

Op Sindoor 2.0: Why & How India Must Prepare for the Next Round?

May 21, 2025

Front Organisations: The Valley’s Homegrown ‘Resistance’ or Pakistan’s Evolving Terrorism Tactics?

2
RISING TENSIONS IN KATHUA

RISING TENSIONS IN KATHUA

1
The Art of Negotitations Three Day Capsule Course | 07th – 09th May

The Art of Negotitations Three Day Capsule Course | 07th – 09th May

1
Condolences, Condemnations and Silence: India’s neighborhood reacts to Pahalgam (South East Asia)

Condolences, Condemnations and Silence: India’s neighborhood reacts to Pahalgam (South East Asia)

1
Russia-Ukraine War: Lessons from an Electronic Warfare (EW) Perspective

Russia-Ukraine War: Lessons from an Electronic Warfare (EW) Perspective

May 31, 2025
Military Diplomacy or Strategic Coercion? China’s Defence Engagement with Pakistan: Consequences for India

Military Diplomacy or Strategic Coercion? China’s Defence Engagement with Pakistan: Consequences for India

May 31, 2025

List of Shortlisted Officers / Candidates: PhD Batch – 7

May 30, 2025
Integration as a Catalyst for Operational Efficiency

Integration as a Catalyst for Operational Efficiency

May 29, 2025

Popular Stories

  • Summer Internship Capsule 2025

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Pahalgam Response: Why India Must Fight Smart?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Results | Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competition – 2024

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Op Sindoor 2.0: Why & How India Must Prepare for the Next Round?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Field Marshal Manekshaw Essay Competiton 2025

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

About us

CLAWS

The Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS), New Delhi, India is an independent think tank on strategic studies and land warfare. The mandate of CLAWS covers national security issues, conventional military operations and sub-conventional warfare.

Follow Us

Browse by Category

  • Articles
  • Autumn 2019
  • Autumn 2020
  • Books
  • CLAWS Focus
  • CLAWS Journal
  • Essay
  • Events
  • External Publications
  • FMMEC
  • Intern Articles
  • Issue Briefs
  • Jottings by Director General Emiritus
  • Manekshaw Papers
  • Newsletter
  • Round Tables
  • Scholar Warrior
  • Seminars
  • Uncategorized
  • Web Updates
  • Winter 2019
  • YouTube Podcast

Recent News

Russia-Ukraine War: Lessons from an Electronic Warfare (EW) Perspective

Russia-Ukraine War: Lessons from an Electronic Warfare (EW) Perspective

May 31, 2025
Military Diplomacy or Strategic Coercion? China’s Defence Engagement with Pakistan: Consequences for India

Military Diplomacy or Strategic Coercion? China’s Defence Engagement with Pakistan: Consequences for India

May 31, 2025
  • Site Map
  • Tenders
  • Advertise With Us
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Other Think Tanks

© 2008-2024 Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS).

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Director General
    • Additional Director General
    • Jottings by Director General Emiritus
    • CLAWS Membership
    • Faculty
  • Publication
    • Web Articles
    • Issue Briefs
    • Manekshaw Papers
    • Newsletter
    • CLAWS Journal
    • Scholar Warrior
    • Books
    • Essay
    • Intern Articles
    • External Publications
  • Research Areas
    • Global & Regional Security
      • China
      • Pakistan
      • Afghanistan
      • South Asia
      • Indo Pacific
      • US, EU & Russia
      • MENA
      • CAR
    • National Security
      • National Security Strategy
      • Nuclear Deterrence
      • Non Traditional Threats
      • Intelligence
      • Terrorism & Internal Security
      • Grey Z & IW
      • Security Laws
    • Military Studies
      • Military Doctrine
      • Military Strategy
      • Peace Keeping Ops
      • Military History
      • Military Logistics
      • Out of Area Contingency Ops
      • Leadership
    • Military Technology & Defence Acquisition
      • Military Technology
      • Defence Acqn
      • Budgets & Finance
      • Defence Infrastructure
      • Human Resources
    • Multi Domain Studies
      • Jointmanship & Integration
      • Space
      • Cyber
      • Spl Operations
      • Energy & Environment
      • Defence Eco System
      • Defence Diplomacy
      • HADR
  • Web Archive
  • Events
    • Seminars
    • Webinars/RTD
  • PROMEX
  • University Cell
    • About The Initiative
    • Admission: Eligibility and Procedure
    • Important Information
    • Administration
    • Guides | Supervisors
  • Careers
  • Contact

© 2008-2024 Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS).